|
PEMBROKE
Pembroke Academy discovers, resolves off-field troubles
By Marc Thaler
Staff Writer
In recent years, the greatest
concern for a pair of Pembroke Academy athletic
programs was turning their struggling varsity
squads into state championship contenders.
Those struggles became insignificant last fall,
after school officials made two startling discoveries.
During the fall 2004 sports season, members of
the boys varsity soccer team and varsity football
team were involved in separate incidents of potentially
harmful behavior to teammates, prompting
full investigations by PA administrators.
"In my view, there was enough evidence of abusive
behavior that we took action against the kids
we felt were at the center of it," said Pembroke
Academy Headmaster Michael Reardon.
Not hazing,
but not acceptable
Word of the two incidents first appeared on the
front page of The Spartans Speak, the school's
student newspaper, in a story for the February
2005 edition.
The school newspaper story printed the headline,
"Gridiron hazing scandal hits P.A.," but
Reardon said the determination was made that
neither incident was an act of hazing.
However, Reardon said the acts were examples
of extremely poor decision-making where joking
around was taken too far.
The first incident involved several members
of the soccer team in early October, according to
athletics director Susan Hutchinson.
While on the team bus, five upperclassmen
"loosely" placed duct tape "around the legs" of an
underclassman seated on the team bus, Reardon
said.
The next morning, the incident was "brought to
the school's attention by one of the two coaches
on the bus at the time," Hutchinson said.
The boys found responsible for the act were
disciplined, but specifics weren't provided due to
privacy issues.
The punishments, Reardon said, were appropriate
considering the severity of the act.
The football incident - deemed worse than the
soccer team's situation by Reardon and his staff
- concerned a group of football players who used
belts as whips while fooling around in the locker
room following practice.
PA senior Matt Allen, one of the 2004-05 team
captains, wasn't a participant in the activity. He
did, however, witness it.
Allen said members of the team were "goofing
off" and "fake fighting" by whipping each other
with towels when certain players decided to use
their belts.
"I remember (sarcastically) saying, 'You guys
are so funny. I don't want to do this. You guys are
so stupid sometimes,'" Allen said.
The use of belts lasted "like two seconds, three
or four times," the PA senior said.
"It wasn't like it happened every day," he
added.
A corrective process
Head football coach Rick Doell first learned
of the locker room misconduct - which he was
told took place in "late September, early October"
- after the season.
Doell said he was on his way into PA to discuss
some off-season items with Hutchinson when he
ran into a junior who'd observed what happened
months earlier.
According to the head coach, the player, while
discussing his off-season, made a comment to the
effect of, "Hopefully what went on in the locker
room doesn't happen again next year."
Doell said the player expressed concerns about
having more team harmony.
"When I found out, it was like a body blow,"
Doell said. "I was concerned. My biggest disappointment
was that I wasn't aware this was going
on. Ninety-nine percent of the time, I'm the last
guy out of the locker room, locking up. I do that
because I want to make sure I have the pulse of
the team."
Through 25 years of coaching, Doell added this
type of problem never occurred on his watch.
Doell said he immediately told Hutchinson
what he learned. Hutchinson quickly informed
Reardon.
Soon after, Reardon asked Hutchinson and
Assistant Principal Margaret Callahan to meet
with every football player individually to take
statements.
Reardon said a script of questions was developed
so every athlete had to answer the same
inquiries from Hutchinson and Callahan.
Based on information supplied by the players,
Reardon said punishments were given to four
boys - three juniors and one senior.
"We felt we were taking reasonable action in
holding them accountable," Reardon said.
Again, due to privacy matters, Reardon wouldn't
discuss specifics of the boys. punishments other
than to say each was suspended from school for
different amounts of time.
"(Punishments) were contingent upon the degree
of involvement based on what the kids told us,"
the headmaster said.
More punishments?
Currently, the three juniors aren't expected to
serve a suspension from the football team at the
start of next season. That decision, Reardon said,
rests with Doell.
"He had a full team meeting. He aired a lot of
these issues," the headmaster said. "The idea is
everyone learned their lesson (from the school
suspensions) and they will move on from that.
Now they're back and they deserve a chance to
be better."
"I've thought about (handing out additional
punishments) pretty extensively," Doell said. "I
don't know what I'm going to do yet. I'm going to
see who's coming back to the team before making
a determination."
Reardon said he received no complaints from
concerned parents after the initial story was
reported in the school newspaper. He said, however,
he had conversations with the parents of the
boys involved.
Hutchinson said she personally called and
spoke with the parents of every single player on
the football team. The purpose of the phone calls,
she added, was to let parents know she had spoken
with their sons and to provide them with as much
information as she could.
The school's AD also said she called and spoke
with the parents of the students disciplined in the
soccer incident.
Doell said he received phone calls from parents,
ranging from supportive to upset.
"I had two meetings with my kids," Doell said.
"I told them if their parents want to sit down or
call me, I'd be more than happy to do so."
In Reardon's eight years at PA, he said situations
such as these have never happened.
Hutchinson, who's been at PA longer, said the
same.
"I've been involved in (PA) athletics since
1986, either as a coach or the athletics director,"
Hutchinson said. "To my knowledge, I don't know
of any incidents like these that have happened."
"What we don't want to happen is for more
serious things to occur, which is why we needed
to address this in a very serious way," Reardon
said. "Adolescents are very susceptible to different
types of messages. This was not acceptable.
They need to treat kids humanely, fairly and be
educated on why that's important."
Before the start of the fall, winter and spring
sports seasons, Hutchinson said she has a meeting
with the coaches of all the teams to discuss a
range of topics.
Currently, Hutchinson said a similar preseason
meeting specifically for the student-athletes
doesn't exist.
"That's something PA is looking at doing," she
said. "Any information we can get across to kids,
parents and coaches, that would be beneficial."
"Kids need to understand where the line is,"
Reardon said. "In the football instance, the line
was clearly crossed."
The soccer incident was also serious, but not to
the level of what occurred with the football players,
Reardon added.
Hurt the numbers?
Doell said he initially had concerns that this
problem would jeopardize the number of kids who
want to play PA football in the future.
But after speaking with his players - specifically
those affected by what unfolded - Doell said
they didn't think it was a really big deal. In fact,
many athletes expected to return for the 2005 season
are already in the weight room preparing for
the upcoming gridiron campaign.
"This was not an initiation-type thing," Doell
said, stressing the misconduct wasn't a hazing
issue.
"The one thing I hope parents do know about
our school is that when a problem arises, we will
address it - especially when it's about safety,"
Reardon said. "It would've been very easy to
make believe (these incidents) didn't happen."
|