|
Updated: 04/14/05
We welcome opinions on topics of local interest! Send a letter to the editor!
Remember to include your name, hometown and daytime phone number (we won't publish your phone number). We reserve the right to edit for length and legal considerations. Send a letter.
Editorial
Support Article 4
Anytime anyone starts asking for a million bucks or
more, it.s bound to get you wondering where they think
people can come up with that kind of dough. And that
seems to be the biggest problem with Article 4 on the
Hooksett town warrant . it.s a heck of a lot of money.
When the proposal first came up to change Hooksett
Village School over to a community center and possibly
even the best place for town hall, it seemed like a pretty
good idea to most of us. Approval had to come from
the voters twice . once on the school side and again on
the town side, even though it.s all the same people voting
on the question. Seems pretty clear folks want that
building to be useful to the town.
What.s harder to understand is that our gfreeh building
is now going to cost $1.5 million to fix up for use as
municipal offices and a community center.
If you think back to the time when the school officials
were trying to persuade Hooksett residents that a new
school was needed, one of the items they pointed to
is that Village School was not up to code and needed
many expensive fixes to be brought up to code. As long
as they didn.t change anything, the condition of the
building was grandfathered, but anything new would
force many changes to the building.
Well, this is that new change. We.ve got an outline
of what those costs will be in this paper, and there.s a
meeting on April 20 at the Hooksett library where you
can learn about them in even more detail.
Will Hooksett foot the bill for that change? We hope
so. The current town hall is terribly overcrowded. The
place is a mess of file cabinets and boxes everywhere.
And just as important, a majority of citizens have
expressed the desire to see the Village School building
converted to a community center. Hooksett has 12,000
residents who would like to see recreational and educational
programs run from that facility. Everything
from computer classes to plays to adult rec basketball
to summer daycare could be run in this building, making
Hooksett a truly wonderful place to live. The quality
of life for both residents and town employees would be
greatly improved by the conversion of this building.
It comes down to paying about $30 extra a year in
your taxes. You.d pay about that just for most health
club memberships per month. It.s an investment in the
community that would have tangible, direct benefits to
everyone in town. Say yes to Article 4.
-Ginger Kozlowski, Editor
Letters
Voters should support Article 4
To the Editor:
A large number of Hooksett
voters (517) completed a survey
two years ago as they exited the
polls. Three hundred and forty
seven said they would like the
Village School used as a community
center hosting activities
for community members of all
ages. Two hundred and one said
the building should be used as
municipal offices.
And 414 said they would be
willing to approve a warrant
article to provide funds for renovations
to the Village School
building for any of the purposes
above.
On May 10, Hooksett voters
will have the opportunity to
fund renovations of the Village
School for Town Offices and a
Community Center.
I urge Hooksett voters who
expressed a desire for a Community
Center and better municipal
offices to get out and vote on
May 10 and support Article 4.
Mike Horne
Hooksett
A .yes. vote for the Hooksett town budget is a win for everyone
To the Editor:
The Kids Kaboose playground
needs your help!
The residents of Hooksett
vote on Tuesday, May 10, and
we are asking you to vote yes
on Article 8, which is the town
budget article.
This year, the Kids Kaboose
playground will be part of the
town budget (special thanks for
Peter Farwell for his concern)
due to the recent dismantling of
many of the structures that were
not up to code by today.s standards.
A yes vote on Article 8 is
also a yes vote for Kids Kaboose
playground.
For the last 12 years, Kids
Kaboose has been supported by
donations and the hard work
of many volunteers. The structures
have weathered over time
and are not up to code by current
standards. Recent lawsuits
have also forced the playground
to close abruptly, and several
structures have been dismantled
and removed.
The once beautiful state-ofthe-
art playground is now in need
of major repairs. The gJourney
Through Timeh theme is now
represented by open spaces.
Even though we have not
asked for your monetary help in
the last 12 years, we are asking
for your help now. By voting
yes to Article 8 of the proposed
town budget, we will be able to
replace the once wooden structures,
with new pre-fab structures
to comply with the new
code standards and make the
playground fun, safe and maintenance-
free once again.
It is not just the Kids Kaboose
playground that needs your
help. Many town departments
also need the funds in the proposed
budget to function successfully
and provide the necessary
services that we need as
residents in Hooksett.
Maria Johnson
Friends of the Kids Kaboose
Hooksett
Hooksett Town Hall workers say Article 4 will improve work
To the Editor:
To the residents of Hooksett:
This is written to encourage
Hooksett residents to vote in
favor of Article 4 on May 10
. to raise the funds necessary
to renovate the Village School
to become town offices and a
community center.
As employees of the town of
Hooksett, we want to perform
our duties in as efficient and
effective manner as possible.
For some years now, lack of
space has been a serious problem
for us. As you are aware,
Jo Ann Duffy and I staff the
planning board; we are very
busy these days due to the rapid
growth in town. As staff of
the Community Development
Department, we are responsible
for the preservation of subdivision,
site plan, and lot line
adjustment records for property
in Hooksett. Very many of these
records involve the residential
properties of hundreds of
Hooksett voters. The material
we are required to keep in paper
format has outgrown our ability
to house it. We cannot add any
more file cabinets because there
is no room for them. We are
working as quickly as the town
will permit us to transfer the
paper into electronic format, but
it will be several years before
that can be accomplished. In
addition, we have large-format
plans that must by state law be
preserved for 20 years. These
are housed in flat files at the
highway garage because we
have no room for them here.
(The floors at Town Hall will
not carry their weight even if
we had the room for them.)
We need to refer to these plans
regularly, and having them three
miles away makes our work
ineffective.
I know there are many other
valid reasons to support Article
4; one that seems important to
me is to convey to all who enter
Town Hall that we in Hooksett
have pride in our community,
that we handle their business in
a professional manner, and that
our community offers a host
of public service benefits. Having
the community center right
there would demonstrate the
town.s commitment to serving
the needs of its residents.
I just want you to know that it
is the desire of all of us at Town
Hall to serve you as well as we
know how.
Charles Watson
Town Planner, Hooksett
Old town offices could be used for new community center
To the Editor:
Constituents have informed
me of the efforts of some wellmeaning
residents in town who
are advocating for the passage
of Article 4.
I have observed and agree
that the use of the former school
on Main Street is in the best
interests of all taxpayers and
will enhance the working environment
for all of the town.s
employees. This opens up the
question; What to do with the
gold town offices?h
Well, many constituents have
expressed that the old town
offices would be an ideal location
for the proposed activities
that the private nonprofit corporation
called CEDCOH have
advanced. They wish to establish
a so-called gCommunity
Centerh for public use.
Should such a lease agreement
be made with this corporation,
the town offices would
be insulated from proximity
detractions that might otherwise
occur.
The gCommunity Centerh
could then be administered by
the nonprofit corporation and
any liability would rest upon
the corporation and not upon
the taxpayer.
Caution should be paramount
when considering anything that
suggests a gjoint ventureh and
the reported use of gFederal
Grantsh must be understood as
credits received from the taxes
you have paid to the Federal
Government in past years.
There is an old saying that
goes something like this;
gThere ain.t no free lunch!h I
can testify to that as a member
of the General Court, which
holds the purse strings of the
taxpayers pocketbook. My
record of fiscal conservatism
speaks for itself and my only
admonition for the taxpayers is,
gLook, before you leap.h
Dick Marple
Representative
Hooksett District 9
Hooksett residents urged to vote no on Amendment 9 May 10
To the Editor:
Growth management, like
heart surgery, is best left to professionals!
Proponents to the proposed
Growth Management Ordinance
have acknowledged that it is
flawed but that it is just a gfirst
steph intended to afford Hooksett
an opportunity to gcatch our
breath.h The courts will be looking
for a better argument.
Let.s look at the facts relative
to the matter of growth
in Hooksett. First of all, it is
important that you realize that
the town of Hooksett already
has a growth ordinance. In fact,
the planning board has been
very aggressive in dealing with
growth issues over the past three
to four years.
In 2001, the town of Hooksett
passed an impact fee (growth)
ordinance, which authorized
fees to be assessed to new construction
projects. Those fees
are used to make infrastructure
upgrades.
The town council commissioned
studies to determine the
impact of various categories of
new construction on schools,
fire stations and equipment,
police stations, recreational
facilities and municipal buildings.
Once completed, the town
had a rational basis for assessing
impact fees on new homes, new
commercial buildings and new
industrial space. A proper foundation
was established and the
impact fees were instituted.
They are working well. The
town has already collected more
than $1.1 million in impact fees;
$811,000 for schools; $255,000
for safety improvements; and
$44,000 for the construction of
recreational facilities.
We are easily tempted to view
growth as the root of all evil. In
fact, growth is often the prime
motivator for correcting years
of neglect.
Ten years ago, Hooksett.s
school buildings were in tough
shape. Both Memorial and
Underhill schools were severely
overcrowded. Both were on life
support, kept alive only with
the aid of temporary modular
classrooms. This overcrowded
condition existed despite a long
drought in growth.
The collapse of the banking
industry and the subsequent
decline in real estate values had
suppressed housing demand for
nearly a decade. Once the market
recovered in the later part
of the decade, growth provided
the motivation and resources to
build the new Cawley Middle
School and to expand and renovate
Memorial.
Largely due to the greatly
expanded tax base and fees on
new homes, we now have first
class facilities which have been
designed to accommodate the
growth which school officials
and citizens know to be coming.
Transportation is another
area where growth has driven
upgrades and improvements.
Hooksett Road has been the
subject of a number of NHDOT
studies. Plans resulting from
those studies call for its expansion
to a four lane thoroughfare,
yet only a few sections
of Hooksett Road have been
upgraded with public funds.
The Granite State Marketplace,
Legends Drive, Cigna
and Granite Hill traffic improvements
were all constructed by
private land owners.
A connector road, which will
relieve traffic on Granite Street
and reduce safety hazards at
Main Street, will be built this
summer with $900,000 of private
funds supplementing the
$600,000 that NHDOT has
committed to the project.
The private sector is contributing
equipment, providing
engineering work and improving
infrastructure throughout
town . needed improvements
that otherwise would be borne
by the taxpayer. Impact fees also
purchased a new staff vehicle
for the fire department this past
year.
Growth presents numerous
challenges, but it also offers
many unique opportunities.
Your planning officials are
working diligently to properly
plan and manage our growth to
make Hooksett a better place for
all of us.
I urge you to vote no on
Amendment 9.
Michael DiBitetto
Hooksett
Why Hooksett School Board submitted new budget to voters
To the Editor:
On March 15, the Hooksett
School Board voted to submit
a new budget to the voters.
This decision is based upon
RSA 40:13 X, which states, If
no operating budget article is
adopted, the local political subdivision
either shall be deemed
to have approved the default
budget or the governing body
may hold a special meeting pursuant
to paragraph XVI to take
up the issue of a revised operating
budget only;
The required wording of the
operating budget warrant articles,
which was Article 3 this
year, included this provision (...
the governing body may hold
one special meeting, in accordance
with RSA 40:13, X and
XVI, to take up the issue of a
revised operating budget only.).
The School Board, the governing
body of the Hooksett School
District, made this decision for
the following reasons:
There was a historically low
turnout, with only 535 voters,
due to the dangerous driving
conditions on March 8.
The budget failed to pass by
only five votes.
The default budget, which is
$500,000 less then the requested
operating budget, would have a
significant negative impact on
the education of the Hooksett
children.
John Pieroni
Hooksett School Board
Recruiting practices misleading
To the Editor:
To the Editor:
While I support our troops, I
believe it is time to end the false
and misleading recruiting practices
of our military.
According to the Marine
Corps Times, the government
has set recruitment goals that are
7 percent higher than last year,
but most branches of the armed
services are below their current
recruitment goals.
The military knows they need
to make adjustments in order to
increase recruitment, but they
should not be allowed to take
students. private information.
The military has also started
distributing video games in an
effort to connect with young
people. These games make war
seem like a lot of fun, something
that can be easily controlled, and
if you get killed just hit the reset
button! In real life, dying or having
your arm or leg blown off is
nothing like a video game. It.s
for real, and it.s permanent.
Is a few thousand dollars for
college three or four years down
the road worth dying for?
William Thomas
U.S. Navy Veteran
Auburn
|
[an error occurred while processing this directive]
|
|