|
Weare
Locals take up fight on eminent domain
Petition to take Souter farm for park gets the necessary 25 signatures
By Nicholas Brown
Staff Writer
A nationwide effort to seize the Weare farmhouse of U.S. Supreme Court
Justice David Souter may be superseded by a local effort to do the same.
In June, the Supreme Court decided to uphold the authority
of a local government to seize private property by eminent domain if,
in doing so, greater
economic benefits to the community could be created. Since
then, a backlash from opponents of the decision has stretched all the
way to Weare.
Opponents have voiced support for an effort led by a California
man, Logan Darrow Clements, to seize the property
belonging to Souter – who
helped formed the court’s 5-4 majority – and there build the “Lost
Liberty Hotel.”
Now a Weare resident has formed his own plan – one that ultimately could
be more effective.
Twenty-year Weare resident Gary Hopper has
collected 25 signatures on a petition
he plans to present to the town clerk’s office in January,
with the hope of allowing voters to decide the fate of Justice Souter’s
property at the next election cycle.
Hopper said he hopes to turn the
land into a park designed
as a shrine to the constitution.
“I think the Supreme Court has incrementally deviated so far from the
constitution it’s terrible,” said Hopper, a former state representative.
Hopper said he
saw firsthand
the power of petition in local government, as he helped lead
the petition
to remove
former
Weare
Police Chief Myles Rigney
from
office, and make the position an elected one.
“If this is an idea that nobody likes, then leave it on the ballot and
let the voters decide so,” he said.
Hopper,
a full-time tool and die maker, said one of his goals
is to send a message to
state legislators, in hopes
that they will solidify
a stance against
the seizure of private property.
Hopper
said he’s aware of Clements’ plan – as was detailed
in a widely circulated press release – to build a hotel featuring a “Just
Desserts Cafe” serving “crow pie,” a museum exhibiting the “permanent
loss of freedom in America,” and a copy of Ayn Rand’s “Atlas
Shrugged” in every room.
However,
Hopper sees his plan for a park as more constitutional,
as visitors can enjoy
the park free
of charge.
“I think we’re more or less heading toward the same end,” he said. “We
just have different avenues of getting there.”
During
a July 29 appearance on the MSNBC television
show “The Situation,” hosted
by Tucker Carlson, Clements voiced support for the idea of a local ballot
initiative.
“We’ve got the the talent and we’ve got the customers,” said
Clements, according to transcripts. “And now we’ve got a new way
to get it through the city – rather, the town – of Weare, in using
a ballot initiative.”
Clements
continued, “Some of the local townspeople who support the Lost
Liberty Hotel have decided that we’re just going to go around the board
of selectmen, because it seems as though the only people opposed to this project
are the five people that sit on the board of selectmen in Weare. And so, with
a ballot initiative, we can just go around them and accomplish the same thing.”
The
board of selectmen, at a recent
meeting,
presented a letter signed by all but
one of its
members, Helene
Kurk, though
Kurk has opposed the seizure
of Souter’s property.
The
letter stated, “We are in full support of protecting the property
rights of all our citizens,” and, “Furthermore, we rebuke all
efforts to deny any citizen of Weare their right to enjoy the full, legal
use of their land.”
While
the ultimate success of a
ballot
initiative
bypassing
the board of selectmen has
yet to be
determined, Hopper said he was
encouraged
while
gathering
petitioners’ signatures at the town’s transfer station.
“After the decision, my wife and I went out to the dump that Saturday
and got all 25 signatures we needed,” said Hopper.
Hopper
said many of the people
he
spoke
with
that
day
were
in full support
of his plan, “but other people didn’t think two wrongs made a
right.”
“We’re fighting for our constitutional rights,” he said. “How
can that be wrong?”
|