|
We welcome opinions on topics of local interest!
Send a letter to the editor!
Remember to include your name, hometown and daytime phone number (we won't publish your phone number). We reserve
the right to edit for length and legal considerations.
Editorial
Safety first
We're a mobile society. And in a mobile society, people
have cars. And people who have cars need a place to park
them. Unfortunately, parking is limited, so not everyone can
get a nice, close place to where they need to be.
Such is the case at Goffstown High School. About half the
students there have driver's licenses, and many want or need
to drive to school. But of course, there aren't enough spaces
in the school lot. And finally, the selectmen have passed an
ordinance on recommendation of the safety committee to ban
parking within a half mile of the school. Safety issues and
neighbor complaints have brought the issue to a head.
So, no more parking along Wallace Road.
Now what?
After the first bit of grumbling, alternatives will be found,
we're sure. Students will get dropped off by parents, a few
will begin riding the bus, carpooling may increase.
They'll get used to it.
The fact is that schools are not obligated, nor can they
afford, to provide parking for every student who wants to
bring their car to school. In this case, safety overrides the
desire, and yes, even the need for teens to bring a car to
school.
-Christine Heiser
Letters
Why not try a four-way stop at Wallace and Shirley Hi
To the Editor:
In your editorial of May 5,
2005, you discuss the necessity
of a traffic light at the intersection
of Wallace and Shirley
Hill Roads. You write that
Goffstown's Highway Safety
Committee, led by Police Chief
Michael French, has recommended
a traffic signal for this
dangerous corner.
You list options that have
been tried in the past, and you
ask "But what hasn't been tried
yet?"
What hasn't been tried yet
is a four-way stop sign at that
corner.
Placing stop signs to stop the
traffic on Shirley Hill Road will
eliminate the problem of drivers
on Wallace Road not being able
to see up or down Shirley Hill
Road, as they will bring all traffic
safely to a stop. And won't
stop signs save money over the
expense of traffic signals, as
well as save lives?
Will the Highway Safety
Committee at least consider this
idea?
Jane M. Bergeron
Goffstown
Mother's Club wants to thank Judy Pancoast for great show
To the Editor:
The Goffstown Mother's
Club would like to thank Judy
Pancoast for another successful
performance held at Mountain
View Middle School on April
15. This was Judy's third event
sponsored by the Goffstown
Mother's Club and once again,
it was a total success!
Since beginning her school
tours in 1996, Judy had produced
four popular collections
of her songs. Her innovative
songwriting won her the Children's Music Web Best Song
for Young Children award three
times in 1999 for her song
"Swimming in Jell-O," again
in 2000 for "The Potty Dance"
and then again in 2004 for "One
Big Eyeball." Also, her 1998
recording, "Candy," won her a
Parent's Choice Award.
Thank you Judy for providing
quality entertainment for
our children and for helping us
raise money for our community's youth!
To learn more about the
Goffstown Mother's Club,
please contact our 2005-06
Membership Secretary Deb
Luppi at 497-5111.
Ann Corriveau
Goffstown
Nothing sensible about George Bush's Social Security plans
To the Editor:
Mr. Bush tells us that the
Social Security system is going
broke. Well, although I hate to
admit it because I don't trust
George Bush, I believe him.
That said, the question is why?
Well for one, if you look back
at the original case for Social
Security made back close to a
century or so ago, you'll find
some of the answer.
Back then attaining the "ripe
old age" of 65 was a major milestone
in anyone's life. Most did
not make it for various reasons
that modern medicine has corrected.
A lot of the rest was
fixed by workplace and product
safety as well as an increase in
public safety.
And even if you did you were
not expected to last more than
a handful of years thereafter.
In short, people today are living
a lot longer and just about
100 percent of us will reach 65.
That means a lot more people
collecting Social Security than
the system was designed for.
The second reason goes back
into the '50s, '60s, and '70s when
the bulk of us "Baby Boomers"
were all earning paychecks and
dropping a whole lot of dollars
into the Social Security "trust
fund," more than it was paying
out by a small landslide. Now
one thing that should never be
allowed to happen is to have a
pile of money just sitting around
Washington.
Those darned Congressmen,
I won't blame the ladies on
this as there weren't any that I
can remember, will find some
darned reason to spend it.
And that they did. Congress
"borrowed" money from Social
Security to fund the Vietnam
War, the race to the moon, and
a whole lot of other unrelated
stuff.
I do believe that even George
Bush's current budget depends
on a sum of money coming out
of Social Security to fund his
war in Iraq.
So, how do we fix this situation?
Well for one, I don't
think the idea of "individual
accounts" is a very good one.
Having an individual account
infers ownership of what's in
that account, meaning that I can
leave it to one of my heirs when
I die, or that a creditor can tap
that account when I default on
a debt. That sure isn't going to
help matters.
Additionally after the last
few years of the stock market's
actions, I don't think the vast
majority of us is smart enough to
do the investing. Take a look at
the Enron scandal. They conned
lots of people who do investing
for a living.
If those people can dupe the
professionals, what chance do
we normal people have of not
losing our retirement nest eggs?
No, I don't like individual
accounts, but then I don't like
that money sitting idle in Washington
either.
So why not let the pros do the
investing for us, on the same
scale as CALPERS, the California
retirement system does.
That way it's out of the reach
of Congress and the White
House, and adding to the available
funds as well. Second, we
Baby Boomers are now nearing
retirement age, but what
says we have to retire? Nothing,
that's what.
So why does Social Security
start paying out benefits when
one reaches that "golden" age?
It's the one government entitlement
system that one does not
have to do anything to start
receiving benefits. Stop it! Set
a minimum retirement age and
make people apply for the benefits.
That should reduce the
number of folks drawing funds
out and possibly keep them on
the donating side instead.
Also put a premium on delaying
that start of benefits. Say
by adding 1 percent or so to
the benefit, you would have
received for every year that you
delay it. They do something
like that today, just extend it.
And last, right now those of
us who are "highly compensated"
stop paying Social Security
taxes after we.ve earned
$90,000 for the year. Why?
Why not eliminate the cap
all together and increase the
amount of dollars being put into
the fund, without increasing the
tax rate.
Must be that this makes sense
because you sure don't hear any
of it coming out of Washington.
Course there never was anything
sensible that ever came
out of that town.
Dick Goulet
Goffstown
|